What's the difference in the government requiring you to buy health insurance, and car insurance?

Buster Exline: Why insurance? Because shet happens and it doesn't just happen to bad driversor people who eat Big Macs 3 times a day. For example, someone could run into yourcar causing you to hit someone else. Your car could suddenly malfunction causingyou to have an accident which causes property and/or medical damage to someoneelse. I understand having medical insurance when you are young can seem anexpense not justified but then again, you could easily be the victim of an idiot driveror get a common disease through no fault of your own. The truth is a lot of things arenot in are our control all the time. When you get older and actually have stuff to loselike your savings or real property that you own, you could lose it all if you end up inthe hospital seriously messed up. Without insurance they can take it all to pay the bill.I used to hate buying insurance too. How I live with it now is I just think of it asextortion money. A payoff to protect what I have so! I have something in old age andcan leave something for my kids....Show more

Elissa Curlin: I suggest that you try this website where onel can get rates from the best companies: http://QUOTES-FOR-INSURANCE.NET/index.html?src=1YA...RE :What's the difference in the government requiring you to buy health insurance, and car insurance?________________________________Okay, I don't think I got my question across last time. My last question I also said:Some state, maybe all, require you to buy car insurance.So, what's the difference between those two? The government is requiring you to buy something.I disagree with ObamaCare, but I also disagree with Car Insurance, but why aren't people getting all bent out of shape out that?__________________________________To add on to that:I understand driving a car is a privildge, but I don't understand why I am required to buy car insurance for owning a car. I feel like that would be saying you have to buy fire insurance for you ho! use because you might catch someone else's house on fire.But, ! what if you are a good driver and don't wreck, why are you still required to buy insurance?I don't see the government telling me what I need to buy and what I don't buy when I own something. I can understand the danger to others, but insurance doesn't make a driver better or worse. If you are a bad driver you need insurance to cover your bad driving, but if your a good driver why do you still need insurance?Follow 18 answers...Show more

George Dingeldein: There is no federal requirement for you to buy car insurance. Car insurance isn't to cover the person that causes the accident. It's to cover the victim in the accident.

Launa Weingarten: Car wrecks can happen to both good drivers and bad drivers, and it's always important to make sure that the cars can be fixed by the person in fault. How would the government know if you are a good driver or a bad driver, and that would technically be discrimination.Okay, for arguments sake, let's say you were driving in a ! car, and you were hit by someone. It's not your fault, but your car has a lot of damage. Wouldn't you like the other person to have insurance even if they are a "good" driver? If they were a good driver and had no insurance, you would be stuck paying for it because I can guarantee that the other person does not have enough money to fix the car on hand at the moment. It's better for everyone if everyone is insured....Show more

Alane Antes: You already said it...you don't have to buy a car and drive, it's that simple.

Sharee Doak: Try https://tr.im/G9j4t

Margy Sandquist: Same reason those red light cameras send the ticket to the owner of the car and not some other person actually operating the vehicle.

Collin Pelfrey: Get the best deals available in your area at: PROTECTIONQUOTES.NET

Manual Burtis: Nothing, they're both scams that futher cripple our economy and is a crutch for all those who do are not smart enough to eat healthy or drive responsi! bly.

Davis Zou: Contrary to the popular notion, there is no requi! rement one purchase automobile insurance. The requirement has to do with financial responsibility. One who has the means can opt to maintain a trust containing sufficient funds to meet the minimum liability requirements and not buy auto insurance. Most however do not have enough money create such a trust and purchase liability insurance instead. Additionally, this is done at the state level, with each state determining liability requirements. Obama's health care approach is at the federal level, and the US Constitution does not give such authority to the Federal Government. Under the Tenth Amendment, any powers not enumerated in the Constitution or prohibited to the states are reserved to the states, or the people. While arguably, a state may have this type of requirement, it us beyond the lawful authority of the Federal Government....Show more

Marvella Benward: Compare insuran ce quotes

An Trebil: There are a number of differences, especially form a constitutio! nal (legal) perspective.First, car insurance laws are mandated by the states, not the federal government. I know this seems insignificant since basically every state (maybe every state) forces you to do it, but this matters a great deal. Second, car insurance is only required when you choose to drive. Health insurance is required by virtue of your existence. This is the first time in American history when an inactivity (failure to buy a product) has been made illegal. What's more, if this permitted, Congress' ability to regulate your private and economic activity would be essentially unlimited because you could be forced to purchase something you don't want or even need....Show more

Fannie Collingwood: Simple answer is, no state requires you purchase auto insurance!Whoever gives me a thumbs down I challenge you to name a single US state that requires you to purchase auto insurance. I can save you some time because there isn't one.

Lawanna Livsey: I recommend you! this site to get quotes -http://LESS-QUOTES.NET/yptdnEM301RE What's th! e difference in the government requiring you to buy health insurance, and car insurance? ________________________________ Okay, I don't think I got my question across last time. My last question I also said: Some state, maybe all, require you to buy car ...show more...Show more

Willetta Munhall: Obama Care and motor vehicle coverage requirement has one considerable distinction. you do not want motor vehicle coverage in case you do not very own a motor vehicle. existence is a appropriate high quality of existence isn't a appropriate quantity of existence isn't a appropriate using isn't a appropriate yet a privilege. Obama Care demands someone to purchase a product against their will, regardless of in the event that they don't choose it purely because of the fact they're alive. A appropriate is under no circumstances compelled. we've had the outstanding to vote because of the fact the belief of the united states of u.s. contained in the Federalist papers yet no person i! s stress to the polls each and every vote casting season. appropriate to maintain and undergo palms yet you will choose to not purchase one. If well-being care coverage is a appropriate then why am I compelled to purchase it and not the different rights contained in the invoice of Rights. Forcing Capitalism on the typical public by a socialist makes me ask your self who's particularly for substantial enterprise...Show more

Rhett Kaines: You don't have to buy car insurance. If you don't drive you don't need it, and if you can prove financial responsibility for the minimum amount of liability without car insurance, some states will waive the insurance requirement. Also, there is no federal law saying you need car insurance.

Faustino Mellerson: No one says you must drive or own a car, but on the other hand if you want to live you must have a body. Also, auto insurance is mandated by the state not the federal government, you can have a low level of insurance on yo! ur car, but the limit for health insurance is considerably higher than ! current lower limits. It is like telling you not only do you have to have insurance on your car, but PLPD is not enough, you must have full coverage regardless of what you need.